Preparing to challenge your beliefs...
Challenge your beliefs with the strongest counterarguments, backed by research. Fight echo chambers. Think critically.
By Liz Stein • Last updated
Click any example to see how ContradictMe challenges beliefs with research-backed counterarguments
Every argument backed by peer-reviewed research, not just plausible-sounding text.
The strongest form of opposing arguments, not weak straw-man versions.
Never condescending. Honest about limitations. Promotes thinking, not “winning.”
Most feeds reward agreement and outrage. That pushes people toward familiar takes, not stronger reasoning. ContradictMe is built to reverse that pattern by presenting the strongest case against your position, including evidence quality, sample size, and limits of each source. The goal is not to force a conclusion. The goal is to help you make better decisions after seeing what your current view may be missing.
Use it to pressure-test an argument before a debate, evaluate policy tradeoffs, or prepare for high-stakes conversations at work and school. If you want details on the project mission, trust standards, or how to get in touch, visit our About page, Contact page, and Privacy Policy.
Good reasoning is rarely about finding one perfect argument. It is about understanding the strongest objections, updating beliefs when warranted, and separating facts from narratives. ContradictMe is designed as a practical thinking tool for that process.
Building an AI that challenges echo chambers